Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YET


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

YET

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Article appears to be promotional. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:47, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment This article was deleted previously, and undeleted per request today. Is it not premature to put up an AFD 8 hours after undeletion? --SuperJew (talk) 20:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , how so? Undeletion doesn't mean it's notable, it just means, in this case, that someone contested a PROD after it had run its course. Notability is not temporary, so the subject is either notable or its not. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah got it. So I wasn't clear on what undeletion process is. --SuperJew (talk) 00:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I cant do so much because of school. Give me some time okay? kikkerdril68 01:42 woensdag 20 mei 2020 (CEST —Preceding undated comment added 23:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , this discussion will be open for seven days. It could be extended beyond that if there is no consensus by that point. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. I searched for "Youth Europe and Theatre". I don't see any coverage at all in reliable sources.  The organization's website says that it has been involved in collaborations among a few schools to produce two student shows each year.  This is nice, but it is WP:MILL. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I made it so it has reliable sources kikkerdril68 —Preceding undated comment added 07:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable. above stated they "made it so it has reliable sources" but they did not add any sources; rather they stripped the article of much of its content. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment i didn’t add sources, i made sure it was reliable kikkerdril68 —Preceding undated comment added 19:45, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment By rules of Wikipedia, this article cant be deleted

When to not use deletion process?

kikkerdril68 And I’m editing it so therefore it cannot be deleted right now
 * Articles that are in bad shape – these can be tagged for cleanup or attention, or improved through editing.
 * Articles we are not interested in – some topics are of interest only to some people, but since Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, articles that interest some people should be kept.
 * Articles on topics you wish didn't exist for personal belief reasons – Wikipedia contains information on all topics, not just those which any person or group agrees with.
 * And I’m editing it so therefore it cannot be deleted right now Yeah that's not...how it works. The article is being nominated for deletion because there are no reliable independent sources about it, not because of any of the stuff you quoted above. You need to provide reliable sources about the article if you want to contest the deletion with any chance of success. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment But how is 'www.Yet.nu' an unreliable source?
 * Please read WP:RS and you will understand what we mean by reliable sources. Generally these are sources independent of the subject of the article and that have an independent editorial board or notable journalist as publisher. -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

kikkerdril68 —Preceding undated comment added 17:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment If you look at the article it has multiple sources about the project

kikkerdril68 —Preceding undated comment added 18:31, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (nn; found no SIGCOV). - Flori4nK T A L K 11:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.