Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaaruku Yaaro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Yunshui 雲 水 09:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Yaaruku Yaaro
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This film is under sourced and not notable. This page was created for a film that has highly negative reviews and has been mocked by other films. DragoMynaa (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. A bad review is still a review and contributes towards establishing notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:09, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
 * comment I agree with Eastmain. I havent performed the search yest, but the "critical reception" section in article is unsourced. There some interesting arguments in previous AfD, but they were not based on policies. I am totally in for bypassing the bureaucracy on the basis of WP:Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, as long as it can be proven what was claimed in previous AfD (December 2009). The film doesnt pass the WP:NFILM. As I didnt perform a search yet, I dont know if the film passes WP:GNG. In case it doesnt, it can be selectively merged with lead actor Sam Anderson (Tamil actor)'s article, who currently has a stub-class article. —usernamekiran (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * , which review are you referring to vote keep. I would like to assess it. Please share the links.  D Big X ray ᗙ  13:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Undersourced and should be cleaned up, but I see notable actors have starred in it. Ambrosiawater (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 02:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is the only source I was able to find, but it is about the film's star, not the film itself: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Sam-Anderson-from-Erode-goes-viral/articleshow/17083300.cms Dflaw4 (talk) 12:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Question to Nominator: Hi, DragoMynaa, do you have access to the negative reviews which you referred to in your nomination? It would be helpful to see them for the purposes of this discussion, I think. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No, I do not have any. Based on other Tamil films that mock his role in this film, this film was not popular/notable (ran only in 4 theatres ) but was notorious. This article should exist only if sources relating to this film are found. --DragoMynaa
 * Okay, thanks, DragoMynaa. I don't feel in a position to vote on this one, but I agree with you—sources are needed. I would, however, argue that notoriety (supported by sources, of course) is equivalent to notability. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.