Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaesu FT-901


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Yaesu (brand). Daniel (talk) 10:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Yaesu FT-901

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A review as might be found in a specialist magazine, not indicating anything notable about this product. Noyster (talk),  10:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Yaesu (brand). I agree with Noyster's comments regarding the notability of the product. Currently the company's page has a long list of product models, so perhaps some introductory info could be inserted from this page as a brief description of the product. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Amateur radio has been notified about this debate. • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  00:05, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I note that another Yaesu product is now up for deletion here: Articles for deletion/Yaesu FT-290R. On the company's article, there is a long list of more than 100 products. 23 are bluelinks and the rest are redlinks. After looking at some of the other articles, it may be the case that all of them belong here at AFD. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.