Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaki Kadafi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Yaki Kadafi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unimportant individual; barely even an article, no reliable sources, and overall fails WP:MUSIC. Just because he was a member of Outlawz for a short time it does not mean he is notable. There really is no significance of notability here. Period. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 17:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable. Res2216firestar 18:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Not sure how to contribute to this discussion; but wanted to say that I find it hard to believe that Kadafi's wiki entry is being considered for deletion: a very popular rapper who worked extensively alongside one of the greatest rappers who ever lived; and who was one of the sole witnesses in the murder of that rapper; and who then went on to die in mysterious circumstances himself two months to the day later???

Yaki Kadafi a member of the outlawz and a close friend of Tupac and a founding member of the outlawz. And his wiki entry is pending deletion? If it's gonna be like that then you can take 80% of the pointless entries on Wikipedia. I believe Yaki Kadafi has a rightful place on Wikipedia and he has contributed alot to some of Tupacs work. People would like to know more information of Tupacs close friend & founding member of the Outlawz. Its unbelievable that this is even considered to be debated. As said above people would like to know more about Yaki Kadafi and what relationship he had with 2pac.

Strange person to cite as not notable enough - this entry should certainly NOT be deleted.--AthenaM (talk) 12:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:MUSIC and lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party sources as required for biographies of living persons. JBsupreme (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.