Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamaraja (wrestler)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Yamaraja (wrestler)

 * — (View AfD)

I can't find any reliable sources to support this person even exists. The article does not provide sufficient reason to imply that Yamaraja is notable, so I'm nominating this page for deletion. If anyone can find reliable sources and add citations to the article I will close my nomination. Yuser31415 06:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete NN backyard wrestler from a backyard wresling "fed". Backyard wrestling feds are almost always deleted as being NN, so that doesn't bode well for the "wrestlers" who compete in them. TJ Spyke 07:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Hey, I'm the owner of Hardcore Sacramento Wrestling. I didn't know how to answer your above message so I edited it to put my answer here. I don't have citations yet but I will in the future. Future meaning in a few days to a week. See our site is still under construction. I put the link to it under references but it isn't up yet. it will be soon though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardcore Sacramento Wrestling (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom. Backyard wrestling is basically the antithesis of all that is notable.  And Mr. Owner, your own site will not suffice as a source, sorry to say.  Reliable independent sources are required. SubSeven 10:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I verify that I exist. if you want, I can upload a video of me doing the springboard moonsault to show that I exist. what do you mean by reliable source? if our website isn't reliable I don't know what else could be. -Yamaraja- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by X Yamaraja x (talk • contribs) 11:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Read this for what he means by reliable sources DXRAW 11:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I verify that I exist too, I'm 15,000 years old, come from the planet Neptune and can lift boulders with my mind. See, that's why we need reliable sources instead of just taking someone's word for it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I am Borg of Chicago!! Attempting to establish notability is futile! Prepare to be deleted! Borg Mighty Ruler of Chicago 19:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Backyard wrestling = NN DXRAW 11:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - oops, did someone just reveal a conflict of interest? MER-C 12:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * DDeleTe Make it onto a PPV, then we'll talk. Caknuck 16:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy backyard wrestler. Whether they exist or not makes no difference with such a hopeless claim to notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, so what you're saying is I have to prove he is an actual wrestler because I could have just made up all that stuff? We will upload videos onto our website of all the wrestlers in action. That will prove he exists and is a wrestler. right? ... And man, some of you guys are some serious nerds. especially Borg. You are loser! prepare to get a life! I don't mean to be insulting man, but seriously. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hardcore Sacramento Wrestling (talk • contribs) 07:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC).
 * You have to prove he's notable wrestler. Notable enough to get a cyclerpedja article. Click on this link: WP:N. You are loser! prepare to get a life! Hmmm.. Borg is claiming to be Emperor of Chicago, which may have a slightly greater and perhaps genuine assertion of notability (see Emperor Norton) than being a wrestler in a backyard wrestling fed. Maybe not quite Vince McMahon, yet? Tubezone 08:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.