Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yamora Kizamazu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   11:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Yamora Kizamazu
Yet another Naruto fan character. Possible WP:OR violation, definite fancruft. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 19:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   -- NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ]  19:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, totally OR. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 21:28, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (also, I snickered at the creator's history.) Danny Lilithborne 21:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a fan-created character that is not part of Naruto (which probably qualifies it as a hoax). The Japanese hiragana still reads Kakashi Hatake, I thought that was funny.  ColourBurst 21:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Jap9c 22:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:HOAX. And even if this is suppose to be a fanfic character, it doesn't pass WP:FICT either. --TheFarix (Talk) 23:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, while I praise the attempt, it's just wishfull thinking. Add on to that the fact that it rambles on at parts, delves into an explanation of a love triange, manages to include the character in pretty much every part of the series without any explanation as to why, etc. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 00:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.