Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Yanel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another CMS, with no third-party references. Fails WP:NSOFT. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Do you mean with third-party references, references like for example

https://www.openhub.net/p/yanel/users or http://stackoverflow.hewgill.com/questions/419/968.html

? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelwechner (talk • contribs) 22:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


 * No, I mean reliable sources providing significant coverage of the topic. I can't tell at a glance what the former URL is supposed to establish, but the latter is a self-published source (a StackOverflow clone). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 10:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Yanel is used as foundation CMS framework for the website of Zwischengas. I am the CTO of Zwischengas and therefore confirm this reference. Zwischengas is the largest platform about classic cars today in the web. I know many more projects that are based on Yanel today but being not the owner of those, It won't help much to mention them here. --Mulsanne74c (talk) 08:58, 26 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  21:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - I would encourage Mr. Wechner to review both WP:GNG and WP:COI to understand why this article fails notability (lack of secondary coverage) and also why he should probably not be editing this article. PianoDan (talk) 14:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No references, and none to be found. Presumably promotional. LaMona (talk) 01:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.