Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaniv Rokah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nakon 04:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Yaniv Rokah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not Notable. No WP:Reliable sources. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep. Upon investigation of the two sources the page creator added, while the page is mildly self-promotional it does have some claim to notability. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use &#123;&#123;ping&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 07:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC) Delete. Wait until subject is more notable for an article Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 10:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NOTABILITY at this time. There is some press on the one movie, but not enough at this time to justify an article.  May well one day!  Just not now. Jytdog (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep is doing excellent work to make a real article out of this.  thanks for your work! Jytdog (talk) 12:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Except: he's got a film this spring at Vail. 2 blue-linked actors in film.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep 2015 film, a documentary, is garnering quite a bit of coverage. Wikipedia is not destructive.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:02, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Fact that Zach Galifianakis took laundry lady in documentary to a red carpet movie premier, then got this homeless woman anapartment, decorated by Renee Zellweger generated stories in Daily Mail, Daily News lots of other papers.  It's still a paltry page, but it passes WP:GNG becasue of that film.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, so there is this, Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard,

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Sockpuppet_investigations/Yaniv_Rokach, as the other commentors and nom are, f course, aware. I am not defending his behavior.  But I think we need to evaluate the coverage of his movies in independent sources, and his IMDB page independently of our feelings about his behavior on WP.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * commentAll facts, assertions in article are now sourced. Sources in include an article about subject in The Jewish Daily Forward and an interview with him in Jüdische Allgemeine, a newspaper in Germany. Note that although Queen Mimi received wide coverage, I only cited articles in which Rokah is discussed. The iVotes on this page were made before I sourced the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as per and  plus in-depth articles in references.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.