Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasek Manzano Silva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Yasek Manzano Silva

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough sources exist to write an article of substance. Questionable notability. Vmavanti (talk) 23:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Vmavanti (talk) 23:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Vmavanti (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC) Vmavanti (talk) 23:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Most sources, as is usual with Spanish names, omit the maternal family name: . If this is kept it should be moved to Yasek Manzano. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has a solid NPR piece; he's also gotten notice from WXPN and Spin. Substantial international coverage clears the bar. Chubbles (talk) 01:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Another example of wishful thinking, with the obligatory figurative, melodramatic phrasing ("clears the bar" hurrah! I saved the baby from drowning!") wholly inappropriate to the discussion and subject at hand. And Vimeo cannot be used as source.
 * Spin can be used as a source, including video content - the independent source requirements are deliberately catholic with respect to medium of transmission. That Vimeo is hosting the content is incidental. Chubbles (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * But what do you make of the sources that I added to the article? They seem to fit the bill to me. There's no shame in not knowing that "Silva" is a maternal family name that is usually omitted when using Spanish names, so why not just be happy that you have learned something new rather than make unfunny jokes about someone else's comment? Phil Bridger (talk) 16:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Let me get this straight. I propose deletion of an article. You respond by telling me about Spanish naming habits on the assumption that I don't know what I'm doing. Then you want me to thank you for having taught me something. Then you dismiss my comments as unfunny jokes. Really? You think that's how it works?

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as has coverage in reliable sources with references to it added to the article such as NPR and Radio France Internationale plus Spin, so there is no longer a valid reason for deletion in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Nom seems testy at the use of "clears the bar", so he crosses the GNG line (barely). He is mentioned in multiple RS. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 13:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I trimmed a few slightly puffy phrases, but I think the sources support notability. Girth Summit  (blether)  11:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.