Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yash Nahar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Yash Nahar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to meet WP:NCRICKET. -Michri michri (talk) 11:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep before he made his first-class debut yesterday, he had already played in 20+ matches. And within five seconds I found this and this to pass WP:GNG.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 14:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Lugnuts. Fade258 (talk) 14:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Although he currently fails the updated cricket guidelines, a simple search has brought about coverage that would suggest a GNG pass. I'd imagine there'd be more in a more extensive search. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per ^ comments from others above. The probability of sources existing suggests the article should be developed rather than deleted. Perhaps it needs someone based in India or with a better understanding of Indian sources to do so? Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:31, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keeep. Meets GNG and has made more than enough appearances. StickyWicket (talk) 23:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.