Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yasmin Siraj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. See comment below - However, sources have been located and nobody has argued against them in 11 days. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ Geschichte (talk) 07:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yasmin Siraj

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSKATE; PROD removed without explanation. Bgsu98  (Talk)  18:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 21:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Sports,  and Massachusetts.  Bgsu98   (Talk)  18:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment But doesn't fail BASIC because the sourcing seems to be there (WBUR, Wicked Local, etc.). As I mentioned to you here, NSKATE is less important than GNG/BASIC. Hameltion (talk &#124; contribs) 21:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The two sources presented by Hameltion alone are enough to meet GNG / WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 06:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep, agreed that there's more than enough to meet both GNG and NSKATE --TJS808 (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Just for clarification, the nominator is correct that the subject does not meet NSKATE. JTtheOG (talk) 23:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. NSKATE is not as important as GNG. This is a useful short article on a skater who was reasonably successful in junior skating tournaments. Articles on those tournaments work in their current format because there are articles on most of the medalists; there is therefore no need to say anything about the medalists in such articles (for example: ISU Junior Grand Prix in France). Deleting articles such as this one, has a detrimental effect on other articles. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as it does not fail Notability and that's more important Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 09:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Several users argue in a way that doesn't concern Wikipedia policy. Please consider replacing such comments with evaluations of sources in the future. Geschichte (talk) 07:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.