Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yavac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The "merge" proposal puzzles me because this article appears to be outside the scope of the target article.  Sandstein  19:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Yavac

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete due to lack of third-party sources and coverage. Stifle (talk) 20:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- raven1977 (talk) 21:11, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  02:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete--this means nothing outside of the books. Drmies (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-- this thing has neither sourcing nor significance outside the books. Reyk  YO!  02:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Bolo (tank) per WP:FICT. Bsimmons666 (talk) 03:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge with Bolo (tank) per WP:FICT. If it is not note-worthy outside the books than that is a reason to keep it within book-related articles, not a reason for deletion.- Mgm|(talk) 08:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete That the subject is not covered in articles which confer it significance outside the fictional world is, in fact, a reason for deletion. Protonk (talk) 08:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.