Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YawpBox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

YawpBox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails web content notability standards. Little coverage in secondary and tertiary sources to suggest passing the general notability guideline. I can find no major reviews either.Google search.  Dr Strauss   talk   20:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: A longstanding WP:SPA article on a defunct social network proposition. The given references are a mix of primary and geographical/alumni local start-up coverage. These don't make a convincing case that it ever attained notability (WP:NWEB or WP:GNG), nor are my searches finding better. AllyD (talk) 08:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Short-lived site that made no measurable impact during its existance and certainly hasn't since.  Fails any remotely reasonable concept of encyclopedic notability for a website. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.