Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yazino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Yazino

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article on an online gaming company that sits right on the cusp of speedy deletion. There are two sources cited in the article, but they're small blurbs rather than substantial coverage. The major flaw, though, is that notability of the subject is not demonstrated—not every company that designs/runs online games is notable. —C.Fred (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and agree that it's almost a speedy delete. Amusingly, for an article with virtually no information it contradicts itself on where the headquarters is. :-) Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:27, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete In a way, it's unfortunate for the smaller and/or newer companies that the bigger and/older ones stand a better chance of an article. However, that's because that's the way things work here. If you're new or small, you have to work harder at finding better refs. (If you're bigger and older, someone's already made the article - and you're trying to remove the unflattering bits...). I did nominate it for speedy, but have no objection if anyone can show it's really notable. Peridon (talk) 15:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find significant coverage to establish notability.  GB  fan  17:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete; purely self-promotion, and no references. --mhking (talk) 22:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.