Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yctc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Yctc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails corporate notability guidelines. A Google search reveals only Bloomberg-esque directory entries and the only third party review is this which is full of puffery.  Dr Strauss   talk   20:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  21:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No indication of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 14:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP. Also, the fact that the subject company is only marginally different from other pipe suppliers qualify it for WP:MILL.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.