Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Year of Desolation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Year of Desolation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as there's nothing currently here to suggest satisfying bands notability guidelines, not even minimally, and my searches found nothing better than this and this. SwisterTwister  talk  06:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Well, I'm not sure about this one yet.  Here's what I've got:  from Blabbermouth (just noticed this is already linked above),  from Exclaim!, and  from Journal Review Online, which I think is a local Indiana newspaper.  There's also  from theprp.com, which I think may be reliable (Billboard quoted it, and the Los Angeles Times covered it).  However, I'll wait to see what others say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG and WP:BAND #1. Source examples include:, , , , . The band is also covered here in New Wave of American Heavy Metal, but the coverage is too short to be used to demonstrate notability. North America1000 04:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per NorthAmerica. Sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources has been demonstrated. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.