Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yearly Physical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck 19:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Yearly Physical

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

future album that presents no reliable sources Will (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball. Obina 17:58, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:CRYSTAL doesn't mention albums... but it does specifically allow for inclusion of notable and likely to occur events. Nominator gives no reason to suspect these albums won't be released so, at most, they should be redirected to the notable band releasing the album, not deleted. Redirection doesn't require AFD. --W.marsh 18:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If and when the album is released, it can prove its notability. Until then I believe Crystal Ball applies. --Stormbay 21:07, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Nothing in WP:CRYSTAL says an album would have to be released to be notable. --W.marsh 21:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and verifiability problems; no sources cited.  Bur nt sau ce  17:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Needs a lot of clean up, unsourced and is a year away from release. West Coast Ryda 13:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.