Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yehia Abugabal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. All three Don't Delete !votes are from the same IP. Hmm... -- RoySmith (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Yehia Abugabal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Created by an SPA. Edwardx (talk) 22:26, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 03:09, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: no independent, reliable sources give meaningful, in-depth coverage to him.   Dr Strauss   talk   19:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete: Thereis independent, reliable sources give meaningful, in-depth coverage to him, this is an Egyptian Public Figure who have been recognized by Forbes.
 * Don't Delete: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOLy7D_SPZM&list=PL3B8A2663363C4402 and https://www.facebook.com/dw.shababtalk/videos/1732565757047018/  his story was recently covered by the Deutche Welle tv channel, i believe this is a reliable source! what kind of sources are you looking for?
 * Don't Delete: i see that this article covers 1- Significant coverage : Yehia Abugabal have been featured in German Tv channel Deutche Welle, Forbes magazine, Forbes Middle East magazine, Arabian Business magazine, and middle eastern news outlets as Cairoscene, Dotmasr network, Youm7 network, CBC and others... 2- Reliable sources and 3-Independent sources ...i think we can all agree that Forbes magazine, Deutche Welle, and Forbes Middle East are well known internationally for being reliable, this means that the publisher has a reputation for fact checking and the text must be approved by an editor before it is printed and being Independent from the subject of the article. they have done their heavy search and fact checking to give him this recognition as one of top 30 under 30.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.205.154.215 (talk) 23:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of WP:SIGCOV. I ran a proquest anews archive search and got exactly 1 hit, a reference to the Forbes 30-under-30 list he was on.  It's just not enough.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.