Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yehuda Zisapel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 19:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Yehuda Zisapel


Prod removed without explanation, so sending to AfD. Very promotional in tone (and to the subject's corporation rather then the subject), also may be a copyvio (a release was promised on the talk page but nothing further has been done). The bare assertions of notability speak more to subject's corporation then subject (and even that is unclear and largely unsourced), so recommend deletion. Seraphimblade 01:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete this is an advertisement, and without merit. Where is the knowledge scope_creep 02:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed, the promotional tone in this article is in no way subtle.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur -- the balance reads as Corporation-cruft smuggled in as bio-cruft. Absent proven notability outside the limited tech frame, this ought to go. -- Simon Cursitor 14:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Dear people, calm down, this article was posted by novice users who do not know how things go in Wikipedia. You are of course right about your points, and I am working to totally revise the article. Patience please. Thanks. —comment added by John Hyams(t/c) June 29, 2024


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.