Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yejong of Joseon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep as inappropriate-forum nomination. Feel free to merge, or to request merge per Geogre. Xoloz 03:13, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Yejong of Joseon
Merge with Joseon Jasmol 03:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep monarchs, of course. Fg2 04:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep heads of state. Gazpacho 06:33, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Monarchs are inherently notable. GeeJo (t) (c) 12:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per other voters. CalJW 13:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep heads of state. Also, please don't nominate things on AfD if you don't actually want them deleted. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 17:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Kings are notable and I am sure that more could be said about him. Capitalistroadster 17:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong, robust and virile keep!!! 'Cause he's the King. BD2412  T 20:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: The nominator was seeking a merge. This is the wrong project page for that request.  The merge can be performed, with a redirect, if there is no opposition.  However, if there is opposition, the proper place to ask for comment is on WP:RFC.  Note that each royal family is covered according to the standard naming conventions.  In the case of Korean, Japanese, Chinese, and other "Eastern" kingdoms, the choice of surname/forename as primary in the article is something I, personally, don't know a thing about, but consistency is vital. Geogre 22:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.