Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yekaterinburg-City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Yekaterinburg-City

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of notability, unable to establish via google/gnews. [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 18:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Not quite sure what's wrong with the existing sources? They clearly establish notability. And there's more in the Russian Wikipedia article...—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 19, 2013; 19:16 (UTC)
 * It looks like most of this never got past the planning phase? looking at the russian site (thanks for the tip) only two buildings aren't indefinitely postponed. In the absence of significant continuing coverage that keeps it in the press, I would say an article like this is WP:TOOSOON or WP:CRYSTAL. If the Hyatt is completed, then that may deserve its own article. -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 19:49, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I agree enough with this to change my opinion. Some of the buildings have been built, others are being built, and others yet have been postponed (some indefinitely). The coverage may not be bustling with news, but it's ongoing (here's a piece of news from only four days ago)... I'm positive that with due diligence a lot more can be found.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 19, 2013; 20:12 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Like all vaporware buildings, once it receives significant coverage, it's notable, period, irrespective of whether actually constructed; in any case, some of these were actually built, per the above. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 12:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Appears to be quite notable. Russian language sources seem available. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.