Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yelf

Yelf was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Stubby history of a non-notable family name. RickK 05:08, Aug 7, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete: belongs in m:GlobalFamilyTree if anything (if and when that project begins). My opinion is the same for all these not-particularly-notable families and family names that are cropping up. TPK 11:50, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: We're not a genealogy project.  It needs to be fleshed out a bit before really being contributory on the Family Tree project, I'd guess.  Saying that it's a Danelaw family that went forth and was fruitful is nebulous to the point of meaninglessness. Geogre 12:18, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Either move it to another area or get rid of it altogether, but it doesn't seem particularly noteworthy or interesting to anyone other than someone with that particular last name. Not Wikipedia material. Skyler 03:05, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete --Vik-Thor 03:53, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not encyclopedic. -- Ian Maxwell 05:05, 2004 Aug 12 (UTC)