Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellayapalem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep.  Syn  ergy 00:48, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Yellayapalem

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable "small village". Could not find any online source that covers the village substantially - all sources I found were either simply lists of places, or mention the village extremely briefly.  Samuel  Tan  13:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep The article claims a population of 10,000, which in my opinion justifies notability. Naturally, sources are needed. Computerjoe 's talk 13:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Indian Registrar General & Census Commissioner claims a population of 8215. Computerjoe 's talk  13:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google Earth says it exists. Gunnar Hendrich (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Villages are inherently notable. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- In the future please do a google search with the site:.in filter to determine its notability before listing. Thanks! =Nichalp   «Talk»=  16:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Request - could someone link the guidelines that make villages inherently notable? I couldn't find it. Thanks! - Samuel  Tan  17:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Notability (Geographic locations) =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - That section doesn't say that villages are inherently notable. It says that they considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. - Samuel  Tan  05:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It also goes on to say that it merits inclusion if covered by secondary sources. Here are some links through Google News =Nichalp   «Talk»=  06:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Real villages are inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 01:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kodavalur unless cultural history that is distinct from the containing mandal is available. Is there anything that can be said about this village that is not also applicable to Kodavalur? --Polaron | Talk 02:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.