Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow Air Taxi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Yellow Air Taxi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable, unscheduled air-charter service lacking significant coverage in secondary sources to support WP:COMPANY ttonyb1 (talk) 16:30, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. RP459 (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per comments above.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  20:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A brief news search turns up what looks like reasonable sources. . is really short,  looks good but is behind a wall,  seems fine as does .  The sources listed seem local, but  isn't.  I'm curious if others thought these sources weren't enough or didn't search. Hobit (talk) 19:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Hobit's links, and in particular this article which mentions the previous scheduled, international services should be enough to contitute 'significant coverage'. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 08:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no refs - nothing that asserts notability> NBeale (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Snuggle This article just needs some love. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.83.208 (talk) 07:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Poorly written is not a reason to delete an article.  While the references may be weak, I'm not convinced that this airline is not notable.  Having an IATA and ICAO code along with sources says keep and cleanup. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:06, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Vegaswikian. Hobit's links provides multiple, reliable sources.  Typically, local companies like this will primarily be featured in local and industry sources and don't receive much attention from national media, but that doesn't make them non-notable. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep just needs a bit more history and content. MilborneOne (talk) 07:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.