Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow Star (Book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination reason no longer applies to the current article. The rewrite has been considered good enough to keep by a unanimous decision. Mgm|(talk) 07:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Yellow Star (Book)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article consists only of an unsalvageable, ungrammatical nonsense plot summary Special-T (talk) 14:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Neutral. No context, no assertion of notability.  Pity A9 doesn't apply to books... Tevildo (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 16:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Granted, this article in its current form stinks. I've added the author name, which was missing, and flagged it for rescue.  This appears to be an award-winning children's book on the holocaust published in 2006, and selected as an ALA notable book in 2007. Jclemens (talk) 20:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Changing my opinion pending sourcing. Tevildo (talk) 20:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the follow up; have a look at it now. Jclemens (talk) 22:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  —Jclemens (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep well referenced book. Exceeds all notability guidelines, nice job Jclemens. Ikip (talk) 22:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Reasonably well-referenced article, book seems notable — Malik Shabazz 22:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: I moved the article to Yellow Star (book) (lower case b) in accordance with WP:DISAMBIG and naming conventions. — Malik Shabazz 22:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Now passes WP:BK with adequate references. Tevildo (talk) 22:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on references. Are the awards notable also?   D r e a m Focus  04:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Some of the awards are, others are local. I'll go through and Wikilink what I can find. Jclemens (talk) 04:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Jclemens. Edward321 (talk) 04:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the article has been completely re-written to satisfactory standards after the AFD nomination was posted. Jwray (talk) 05:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.