Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow arrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Yellow arrow

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability provided but no 3rd party sources to back it up. Reads like an advertisement. Albacore (talk) 19:18, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Non-notable art "underground" project lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. A couple of articles exist that mention the project in passing, but again, nothing of substance.  Article fails to support claims of notability by providing reliable sources.   ttonyb  (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:04, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Basically, what user:ttonyb said above. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 04:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep while it lacks originality of something like Letterboxing, the sources appear to check out.
 * Making Connections, Here and Now, New York Times, Ethan Todras-Whitehall, 25 January 2008,
 * Targeting the 'Art' Around Every Corner, washington post, 2 July 2005, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tetron76 (talk • contribs)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  EBE123  talkContribs 10:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The Washing Post has an entire article dedicated to this phenomenon. It has made news around America.  Many other major newspapers cover it.   D r e a m Focus  23:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * (non-admin closure) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep: Sourcing in article shows notability, AfD is not for cleanup.--Milowent • talkblp-r 10:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.