Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow dog (design)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 01:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Yellow dog (design)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Probably a hoax. It was created by a single purpose account in 2006 and later wikified by a legit user, no activity since. Google points to a manufacturer of dog leashes. Targeman 01:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as possible hoax. No proof that this term's used in this context. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 01:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like a hoax, and possibly even patent Nonsense --Nenyedi Talk Deeds@ 01:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as it probably is a hoax. JodyByak, yak, yak 02:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; there's a technique in film-making where the editor inserts an out-of-place shot to distract a producer fom a bad edit, so the producer is so busy trying to work out why that shot is in the film they don't notice a continuity error/plot hole/etc. This sounds similar, but I can't find any sources so it's unveriable or too obscure to be kept. Masaruemoto 02:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds hoaxy to me. The text, if read carefully, doesn't even really make any sense. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete sounds like a hoax and doesn't really make sense. Oysterguitarist 03:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.