Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellowfin Business Intelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Yellowfin Business Intelligence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional page. Was un-deleted, and a large list of awards promptly restored. No fixes to the page's promotional content to make it neutral have been made. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  21:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: I previously proposed this for deletion. Yellowfin does not meet the notability guideline for companies. – Teratix ₵ 22:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Teraplane (talk) 02:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete (I'm tempted to say salt also). This clearly isn't notable and only serves to advertise the company. It really shouldn't have been recreated in the first place. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt No indication of being notable. Fails WP:NCORP on many ways.   scope_creep Talk  09:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.