Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellowwood Future Architects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 00:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Yellowwood Future Architects

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability with only a self reference, has been proposed for deletion in 2009 and marked as non-notable and un-referenced since 2009 MilborneOne (talk) 18:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Delete - no notabilityMasterknighted (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG.LM2000 (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Highbeam turns up some coverage in the South African Saturday Star on the back of their annual "Engager Survey" but nothing substantial about the firm. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.