Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yelptini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Yelptini

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

New mixed drink, nonnotable despite being mentioned in passing in one story in Forbes magazine. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, 85 total Google hits suggests this thing hasn't taken off. Abductive  (reasoning) 22:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I get "about 1,600" per google, which is still pretty low for something invented in 2007. To be fair, 400 are on the Yelp.com site and many seem to be Wikipedia mirror sites.  We ought to check some real bartending books.  Perhaps among some of these sources there is more than a passing mention. - Wikidemon (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Go to the end of the search results; 85. Abductive  (reasoning) 23:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, interesting. Thanks.  What does it mean when google says there are so many results but produces only 5% of them?  I'm guessing that means most are duplicates in google's eyes, likely yelp.com pages, copies of the Wikipedia article, spam pages, and so on.  Wikidemon (talk) 00:20, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it also looks at close strings. Abductive  (reasoning) 02:03, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete But this weekend, try ordering a Yelptini, and bring your laptop when the bartender says, "What the fuck is a Yelptini?"  Mandsford (talk) 15:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I was unable to find any significant mentions in any reliable sources; google just spits out non-independent, trivial or unreliable citations, and wasn't able to find much via ProQuest either. Martin Raybourne (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh dear - this is not looking good. Wikidemon (talk) (article creator) 03:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It is not so bad! I realize now that my first article should have been deleted on sight (which it was, so...) Ok I guess I was not going any where with that comment. Martin Raybourne (talk) 21:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Abductive. Glass  Cobra  16:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.