Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yentaganahalli nelamangala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator with no !votes to delete. (non-admin closure) shoy (reactions) 19:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Yentaganahalli nelamangala

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unclear article. I see that a speedy deletion tag was removed but the actual revision is concealed so I cannot see the exact content of the nomination. The article itself is brief and incoherent, the only source is a blog so I'm not seeing convincing evidence of notability here. Since the speedy was removed I am bringing to AFD. Mabalu (talk) 12:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  15:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep While the article itself appears to be fairly terrible, there is long standing consensus that inhabited places can have articles on them if they are shown to exist. Per WP:NGEO: "Legally recognized, populated places are presumed to be notable". While English sourcing is poor it does exist Google Maps View, One Five Nive lookup, India by road. This subject meets those criteria and therefore can be kept as a suitable stub can be created. Winner 42 Talk to me!  19:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Yentaganahalli or "Yentaganahalli, Nelamangala" "Yentaganahalli, Bangalore Rural". Verifiable village of ~1,160 people according to the 2011 Indian Census. Passes WP:NGEO. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Additional comment. I just did some basic cleanup. It still needs work. • Gene93k (talk) 04:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Happy to withdraw; Comment - I've removed the last passage which made very little sense and the citation was to a blog apparently advertising someone's medical services. Move sounds good. Am happy to withdraw nom and see page moved to Yentaganahalli. Mabalu (talk) 10:15, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.