Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeongi–Gongju


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. as per no prejudice against speedy renomination and also, relisting it will be nothing as there are no participants in the past 3 relistings. (non-admin closure) Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 01:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Yeongi–Gongju

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yeongi–Gongju is non-existent area. It says just adjacent places Yeongi County & Gongju. See. Yeongi-Gongju and Gongju-Nonsan (Gongju & Nonsan) are temporarily stated as candidates, and candidate Yeongi-Gongju now becomes Sejong. If it is keeping, we should make meaningless articles for all adjacent area. Sawol (talk) 21:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm looking at the link you provided, and it says "The government selected Yeongi-Gongju yesterday as the most favorable locale to replace Seoul as the nation's administrative capital." I do not think the government selected a non-existent area as the most favorable location. The NYT calls it a city now: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01EEDD1139F937A1575AC0A9629C8B63 -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeongi is existent area. Gongju is existent area.  Yeongi–Gongju means the candidate through Yeongi & Gongju, is a temporary name for several years.  Now the candidate is Sejong which consists of whole of Yeongi and a part of Gongju.  If this is kept, What is included in this article?  Sawol (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The candidate area is commonly referred to as an entity as Yeongi–Gongju in notable, verifiable, reliable sources. The article includes what the article includes now, and/or whatever improvements editors wish to make to it. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect I suggest a redirect to Sejong City.  Sawol (talk) 06:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey   01:11, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.