Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeovil True


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeovil True

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not a notable song. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:SONG says "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts.....are probably notable" - this song meets that requirement. If that isn't enough, I have just added sources from the BBC and The Times, no less..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC) (article creator)
 * Keep. Coverage in at least three reliable sources (two already in the article plus this) and a chart appearance seems to be enough for not only WP:NSONG but WP:GNG as well. I can understand the nomination, as none of the sources were cited when the article was nominated, but it looks like a keep now. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Chris has proved notability. GiantSnowman 01:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. WP:NSONG also says "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." I'm sure sure this can be expanded beyond a stub, so I'd keep the merge option open. But as it charted (just), it's definitely not something for deletion. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.