Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yes Giantess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close because the article in question was speedy deleted by Nyttend (non-admin closure). D OOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes Giantess

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced and do not look notable per WP:BAND. Nsaa (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - The reliable sources just aren't out there; fails the general notability guide. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BAND. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I fact I have restored the speedy delete tag removed by the author, since, despite some rewording, it is still clearly a copyright infringement. However, even if it were rewritten to deal with that issue it would still qualify for deletion. There is no evidence of notability at all. The only "references" given were to Wikipedia articles (and even those confirmed only tiny details of the content of the article). JamesBWatson (talk) 13:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Deleted as copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.