Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeshiva Torah Ohr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeshiva Torah Ohr

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Reads like an advertisement. WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Also, lacks third-party verification beyond confirming that the buisness exists. Battleaxe9872 19:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Educational program with no assertion of notability. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 20:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete and Redirect to Chabad outreach, of which this is but one small example. IZAK (talk) 02:55, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. non-notable and advertising.  Once the article exists we might want to hijack it to create an article about R' Chaim Pinchas Scheinberg's yeshiva, Torah Ohr which has a good deal more history and notability.  Joe407 (talk) 04:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Um Joe: No "hijacking" necessary, in any case that would defy WP:ETIQUETTE. Many institutions and people share the same sort of names. That's why there are WP:DISAMBIGUATION pages or other methods. In this case, a typical Wikipedia solution is Yeshiva Torah Ohr (Chabad) or Yeshiva Torah Ohr (Florida) and the other could be Yeshiva Torah Ohr (Israel) or Yeshiva Torah Ohr (Jerusalem). But it's just that this particular institution (i.e. Yeshiva Torah Ohr (Chabad)/(Florida)) is simply not notable, it's not even a "yeshiva" as such from the one self-promotional link, it's just another way that Chabad conducts it Chabad outreach, and can be legitimately used as an example there. IZAK (talk) 07:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete – I generally give some leeway to articles about schools but this "study program" doesn't approach meeting the WP:ORG criteria. No need to keep it as a redirect. ✤ JonHarder talk 20:21, 11 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.