Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeshwant Mahavidyalaya, Nanded


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eagles 24/7 (C)  19:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Yeshwant Mahavidyalaya, Nanded

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Please consider these reasons for deletion:
 * The article is currently a vandalized mess. It is unreadable gibberish.
 * The article never made sense.
 * The article has never had sources. There ARE a couple of sources relating to the college, but they are iffy and scant.
 * Prior to my removal, the article featured a link to irrelevant porn.
 * The name of the article implies that there are multiple places called "Yeshwant Mahavidyalaya", although there is nothing else on Wikipedia or the anglophone internet (that I found) regarding another organization. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 18:44, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete/Speedy Delete No citations. Seems like maybe even a speedy delete (A7) on the basis of no claim to importance - above my pay grade to comment, but no justification to keep this. CT55555 (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No RIS found in English. I’d consider changing my !vote if anything is found in Marathi. Mccapra (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, A7 even. Nothing notable for sourcing found. Oaktree b (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete There's zero references in the article to indicate that this is notable and I couldn't find anything about it when I looked that would help with notability either. So from what I can tell there's no reason to keep the article. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.