Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeter'el


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Fallen Angel. See also Articles for deletion/Tuma'el and Articles for deletion/Neqa'el - Nabla (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeter'el
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Mythological creature that fails WP:V. The article is unsourced since its inception in 2003 (!). No on-topic search results, except one Google Books search result that seems to indicate that an angel of that name is mentioned (by name only) in the Book of Enoch. That one mention doesn't support an article dedicated to this subject.  Sandstein  17:18, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:N... Only mentioned in a list of angels that lead the fall of man in 1 Enoch 69:2. There isn't even any further information on them in the bible other than that list of names. - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RS This is a more than 4 year old article with no reliable sources. Artene50 (talk) 19:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I could see an article on fallen angels (provided it is reliably sourced, but as is, it is not notable. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above--same reasoning. I actually think we could find sufficient older printed literature, but I'm not able or willing to do it myself now. DGG (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Question: Redirect to?... - Nabla (talk) 23:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * List of fallen angels (that's my suggestion) LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.