Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeti (US Company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeti (US Company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional page for borderline notable company. Lack of notability is not the only reason for deletion. Borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason. Small variations to the notability standard either way do not fundamentally harm the encycopedia, but accepting articles that are part of a promotional campaign causes great damage. Once we become a vehicle for promotion, we're useless as an encycopedia  DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Can you please specify the "clear promotional" content? If you do, then we can make changes. This company is notable and deserving of a wikipedia page. Nobody here is trying to use Wikipedia as a vehicle for promotion. Imarapaholic (talk) 22:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure but what the article needs is more third-party coverage and my searches found none. SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now but feel free to draft & userfy as my searches found no better coverage than currently listed. SwisterTwister   talk  06:58, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as irretrievably promotional and essentially non-notable. User:Imarapaholic, if you don't see that this looks more like a company blurb than an encyclopedia article, I'm seriously concerned about your level of understanding of what Wikipedia is and is not. --Slashme (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.