Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeti (programming language)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 12:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Yeti (programming language)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an ML scripting language still in development (Version 1.0 release "in sight" as of one month ago, with no suggestion that it's actually been released as of today), sourced only to self-published web pages created by its own developer and citing no reliable source coverage to demonstrate that anybody else has taken notice of it at all. Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform for computer developers to promote their projects; a programming language only gets into Wikipedia when RS coverage attests to its actual real-world usage. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - No signs of better satisfying the software notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  05:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see significant coverage in reliable sources.  A search with the author's name included shows very few hits.  Without it, the results do not seem relevant.  I even got a few hits on Indonesian yeti. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Software (programming language) article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage of this language.Dialectric (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.