Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yeti Sports

Yeti Sports was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep

Yeti Sports
Non-notable flash game. Won't stand the test of time. --fvw* 03:24, 2004 Nov 28 (UTC)


 * It's being forgotten, even as we speak. Delete - DavidWBrooks 04:29, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * It eventually mutated into a PC game, I think. If so, it could be kept. - Vague | Rant 08:11, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but needs adding to. 157,000 google hits for "yeti sports" and a further 282,000 for "yetisports", and the Yeti Sports Deluxe game make it notable. [[User:Xezbeth| Xezbeth ]] 11:50, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not only does it garner many google hits. The game had follow up games - is in game 5 now, I believe. Is also available on mobile phone as a result of a joint venture with a mobile phone company. It needs polishing up, but it's definately notable. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 11:55, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * delete not notable - not every game available on mobile phones is notable. - Drstuey 13:07, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: I've played it. It was funny.  It is being forgotten as we type, yes.  It's a bubble.  Geogre 14:48, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. They still do new Yeti Sports games it seems, and at least here in Germany it's quite well known. --Conti|&#9993; 16:26, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Not notable? That's ridiculous. Everyone has heard of it. And it actually has 6 sequels... Grue 18:20, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Er, I mean keep. Grue 18:23, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's obviously pretty notable.  --Idont Havaname 18:43, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, article doesn't establish notability - Cdc 21:30, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article establishes notability. Dr Zen 00:21, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * OK, now I'm convinced fvw got drunk over the weekend and later went out on some sort of deletionist rampage. (I kid, I kid!)  Extreme keep, of course.  &mdash;[[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 05:55, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article doesn't have to establish notability.  If it did have to, we wouldn't have so many stubs and substubs.  A topic's notability is independent of the quality of the article.  If you don't like the stub, fix it or list it for expansion.  Chuck 22:27, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * delete i agree with Drstuey Fledgeling 03:15, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not quite a phenonema, but still notable enough to keep.[maestro] 09:32, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.