Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yetol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Spellcast (talk) 12:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Yetol

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable company, previously speedily deleted several times as non notable and spam. Torchwood Who? (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; Non-notable and seems to be original research. --HamatoKameko (talk) 10:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I am a secondary source, originally i have not made this clear. I have collected this infomation from the websites owner. Yetol.com is a company, and even through not world wide known it is still a company. If you wish to observe the website go to www.yetol.com I am a writer/critic for a small website analysis company that rates new websites and publishes a history about them. Triippe (talk) 09:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleted Several times because i was accused of writing about a website i am accused of owning, which is not the case.


 * Delete, it's brand new and there are no independent attributions of notability. --Dhartung | Talk 10:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Somewhat non-notable. Alberon (talk) 11:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Dont Delete It is notable, why are all you people so obsessive. Pete (talk) 11:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * dont deleteit I think it is fairly notable. But these people arnt being obsessive Jake746 (talk) 11:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: The closer of this AfD should note that the preceding two "don't delete" opinions were added, with falsified signatures, by Triippe, the article's creator. Deor (talk) 11:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I struck out the forged !votes. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 12:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - notability isn't a matter of opinion - see WP:WEB which requires that, for instance, "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." No such references are presented, and for a new company set up this month it's unlikely they could be. Wikipedia isn't the way to become well-known - you have to be well-known first. JohnCD (talk) 11:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Just delete it. the whole page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triippe (talk • contribs)


 * Delete - doesn't meet any notability criteria. Pseudomonas(talk) 12:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Triippe (talk) 12:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Just delete it, there is no article anymore


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.