Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yggdrassil (network protocol)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Yggdrassil (network protocol)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:TOOSOON and insufficient reliable sources for notability. Only sources are github reports, and a presentation at a conference. Article says the product is still in development. Disputed PROD, and rationale for disputing the PROD was because disambiguation was required, which is not a rationale to overcome lack of notability. Singularity42 (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC) If the differentiation in the stub can be incorporated in the disambiguation page (which currently fails to capture several entities of that name), then deletion will do no harm. Although, one of those nice templates saying "This article is a stub, please improve it" would probably yield results!Michaelgraaf (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Singularity42 (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Singularity42 (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Obvious not fit for namespace as it stands and AfD is no place to improve such a poor effort. Creator's dePROD without improvement seems either disruptive or showing a lack competency which is not worthy of TOOSOON/draftification option.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.