Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yipster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Yipster

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Isn't this something that should be on wiktionary instead of here? Doesn't seem notable as an encyclopedia article. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as a neologism. See WP:NEO.  KDS 4444  Talk  02:18, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - about as WP:DICDEF as it gets. No prejudice against recreation if content is added to make it encyclopedic and sources added to pass WP:NEO. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. The source used is even a "neologisms database". Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.