Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yksisarvinen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  Sandstein  18:58, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Yksisarvinen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently, this is a very common word in Finnish, as searches turned up hundreds of items. However I looked through the first 150, and couldn't find a single one which refers to this book. It's been uncited for 9 years, and has only consisted of a plot summary. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: Because "yksisarvinen" is a common Finnish word, you should try to search "writer's name + book's name" (= "Kaari Utrio + Yksisarvinen"). I found these reliable sources:
 * The latter is behind a paywall but it's about 20 paragraphs long review by the largest subscription newspaper in Finland. 85.156.64.153 (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The latter is behind a paywall but it's about 20 paragraphs long review by the largest subscription newspaper in Finland. 85.156.64.153 (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The latter is behind a paywall but it's about 20 paragraphs long review by the largest subscription newspaper in Finland. 85.156.64.153 (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.