Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ynna Asistio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Ynna Asistio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: non-notable actress, mostly consigned to guest roles on reality and game shows. Quis separabit? 23:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage by reliable sources. http://entertainment.inquirer.net/164561/derek-ramsay-finds-new-love http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/entertainment/08/15/13/ynna-asistio-moves-abs-cbn   http://www.abante.com.ph/ent/other-stories/16222/ynna-asistio-di-takot-madamay-sa-kaso-ni-derek.html   http://archive.sunstar.com.ph/cebu/lifestyle/2013/08/26/lesson-heartbreak-299847  Ross-c (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * All but one of the above are gossip tabloids, describing the love life and rumours thereof, of Ms. Asistio (one is in Tagalog but I can tell by the reference to "Derek" that it is in this category); the other details how the thespian "recently took up her first project as a Kapamilya contract artist." Quis separabit?  00:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * That is true. However, I refer you to WP:NOTABLE and WP:NACTOR. Particularly for the latter, we have "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." as a qualification of notability. Ms Asistio's popularity in the gossip tabloids shows her popularity, and establishes notability. I'm no fan of gossip tabloids myself, but am attempting to objectively apply Wikipedia's guidelines. In WP:BASIC, we have "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]

If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.". The sum total of multiple sources IMHO satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and hence the article should not be deleted. Ross-c (talk) 05:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete Of all the sources in the article or mentioned above, only ABS-CBN provides more than trivial coverage. It's about her moving to ABS-CBN however, so it is not an independent source and does not count towards notability - they have a vested interest in publicizing her. The purpose of the significant coverage criteria is to ensure that enough reliable third-party material exists to write a full and balanced biography. Adding up all the other passing mentions of her does not, in my judgement, yield significant coverage, so the subject does not meet WP:BASIC. Worldbruce (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:55, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Numerous references such as here and here and here and here and here and here, lots of attention, easily meets WP:ACTOR and the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.