Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yo lee cornith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW. Mgm|(talk) 11:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Yo lee cornith

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am proposing this article for deletion as the prod protocol was used, the original editor did expand the article, but still included no references. Further edits were made from an IP adding further content with no refs. A google search turned up no hits other than possible facebook/myspace pages. Both editors have only made edits either to this article or vandalism edits to Staten Island. The article style seems to suggest this a bit of a hoax really. Anyway. Deletion? Fol de rol troll (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of any coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability - Facebook pages do not cut it. Whether this article is truly a hoax or not seems almost immaterial - either way, the subject has clearly not received anywhere near enough reliable-source coverage to support a verifiable encyclopedia article. ~ mazca  t 22:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; vanity piece with no verifiable significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. EyeSerene talk 22:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The strongest of all deletes - this kind of AfD is the most annoying of all - the one that slips through speedy delete but obviousy has no place in Wikipedia. Thank god we can call a snowball delete on it if we so choose Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Can we go any stronger? The Myspace and Facebook aspects of this are interesting, but I believe this comes down to your basic WP:HOAX, especially when you look at the Myspace page for Big Mama, supposedly the mother of Yo Lee Cornith . Eauhomme (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Hoax is evident, suggest ignoring all the rules and just speedy deleting it. At the very lest, give the user a warning about deliberately false information and hoaxes. Cheers.  I 'mperator 20:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete Power.corrupts (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom.  --Clay Collier (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.