Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogavidaananda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as vandalism (spam, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, tone, no context). Just zis Guy you know? 11:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Yogavidaananda
Delete. Reprod. 1st prod was "Inappropriate title, original research, no context." 2nd prod was "spam." Both are right.- CrazyRussian talk/email 01:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Koffieyahoo 02:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jammo (SM247) 02:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as original research, wikipedia is not free webspace, etc. - Richardcavell 02:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom both prods were right --Deville (Talk) 02:57, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Khoikhoi  03:44, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NOR and Wikipedia is not a free webhost. --Coredesat 06:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Robertsteadman 09:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — M e ts 501 (talk) 13:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd like to see more articles on Tantra and Hinduism, but this is (bad) OR and a how-to instructional page. Inter lingua  talk 15:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sophy&#39;s Duckling 23:35, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.