Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogesh Ingale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Yogesh Ingale

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Was deprodded with the rationale, "strong and supportive reference added so code is removed". The two additional sources are just as strong and supportive as the other citations available in the article or in searches. In other words, they are simply brief mentions. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Chelokabob (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE – Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Disagree. Many news links are proving the person notability. Jsah258 12:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: I am relisting this to give those holding the "keep" position a chance to concretely show how the subject is covered in-depth by independent, reliable sources, because currently none back up the assertions. As it stands, the arguments for deletion are far stronger. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 02:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Individual is definitely notable. Article must be improved with better sources and with links from other Wiki pages.InfiNeuro (talk) 06:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agreed. Not enough in-depth coverage, YeRe YeRe Pavsa film is not yet released. Not even name in the Maharashtra Times News Cinzia007 08:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I have closely watched all the news, I believe this person is noteworthy, he is an art director who has done very important films, which have important films like Ghuma, Dhondi, Re Raya, Illu Illu, Jayanti, Soyrik, etc which have been released in which his name is mention as Art Director.Zgz.or (talk) 17:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep This discussion is related to the Marathi cinema of India on the basis of which there is enough coverage.Priyatungi (talk) 02:50, February 24, 2022 (UTC)
 * Note to closer, none of the keep !votes is actually based on policy.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the works seem to be non-notable; even if they are, I doubt if WP:NCREATIVE applies to Art Directors. Cannot see WP:SIGCOV either. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Respected dear friends, this discussion is about a local language art director, according to which there is enough coverage, if you know the Marathi region, then you understand that this is enough coverage according to the art director. We are discussing here an art director who has done more than 12 films, whose many Marathi films have become a hit.Aaajit22700 Aaajit22700 (talk) 02:30, 08 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability has been judged on regional zone and it is ok, links are suppotive for Wiki pages. Azaishah2000 (talk) 07:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * What you are saying makes no sense. There is no local, national or global notability. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - once again, none of the keep !votes is actually based on policy.  Onel 5969  TT me</i> 17:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Not realising WP:FILMMAKER. There are 4 criteria there and he meets none of them. His contribution to the projects he has done can’t be considered that big that he would qualify this policy. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 14:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. My searches in English, Marathi, and Hindi didn't find anything beyond trivial mentions along the lines of "the film's art director was Yogesh Ingale". These sorts of passing comments do not constitute significant coverage, so Ingale does not meet the GNG. Assuming for sake of argument that WP:NCREATIVE applies to art directors, he doesn't meet any of those four criteria either: they each require that the subject be considered noteworthy in some sense by the outside world, and there's no indication here that the outside world has accorded him any in-depth attention at all. I hope the closer looks at more than just the pure !vote count here: the keep arguments are not rooted in our policies or guidelines. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.