Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath (2)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 14:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath
Despite numerous requests for secondary sources, none have been forthcoming since January. Without secondary sources, articles cannot comply with WP:NPOV and thus should be deleted or a best stubbed. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

''Note: The article survived a previous AfD. See Articles for deletion/Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath.
 * Delete as nom. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.   --   &rArr; bsnowball  10:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - The subject is unnotable to begin with plus article history shows that there is absolutely no hope in getting NPOV sources. -   S e n t i n e l    10:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete ..No reliable secondary sources, self published primary source filled with extraordinary claims, subject unnotable. -Vritti 17:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. &#2384; Priyanath talk 17:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Hamsacharya dan 22:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Very, very weak keep.  Article is finally near-neutral, though frankly anyone seeking news of the subject will be met with zero results on google.   — Athænara   ✉  01:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.188.69.161 (talk • contribs)


 *  Delete, No reliable sources. Notability questionable due to minimal results on Google. EdJohnston 21:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per ≈ jossi ≈. --Fire Star 火星 12:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Anwar 14:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.