Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per not having a chance in the fires of Mt. Pinatubo— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 04:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Yogiraj_Gurunath_Siddhanath

 * - (View AfD) (View log)


 * Speedy Delete - Both subject and primary author requests that the article be deleted per Archive 4 and 1st Afd. - Senior Hamsacharya 01:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, unless there is a legal issue involved, or subject is not notable to warrant an article in WP. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. AFD for this article appears to have been used as a form of harassment. HalfShadow 02:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry but conjecture is not a valid ground to vote keep, Re: "appears to have been." - Senior Hamsacharya 03:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I beg to differ. Plus, your contibutions show you've been 'fishing' for votes. HalfShadow 03:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Bad faith nomination, nomination reason is not valid. Page is not 'owned' or 'authored' by anyone, info was submitted under GFDL "to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it". There is no reason to believe that someone else may not had added the information themselves if not for the above contributors.--Dacium 03:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to meet WP:V and WP:BIO, no WP:BLP problem. Subject's reticience and modesty is to be commended, and should be mentioned in article if it can be independently sourced. --Shirahadasha 03:20, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep subjects desire to not be covered is not grounds to remove an otherwise notable entry. JCO312 03:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep meets WP:BIO -- Selmo  (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Again.... &#2384; Priyanath talk 03:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - user Senior Hamsacharya is probably a sockpuppet of known vandal NoToFrauds AKA Terminator III and is in no position to nominate anything for deletion. 03:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.